On the theory of software testing
C.A. Middleburg of the University of Amsterdam has conducted a literature survey to find out about the state of the art in software testing theory. I will quote one of his conclusions here: Some remarkable observations are: in the development of existing theories about software testing, what sets software testing…
CPP unit testing frameworks
In a previous post, I was discussing briefly which the best C++ unit testing framework could be. The economic benefits of succesfully applying unit testing are substantial after all. After careful consideration I have found two candidates: Google Test and Parasoft C++Test. Google Test is a comprehensive unit testing framework…
CPP unit test overview
In my last post, I talked about the economic benefits of unit testing. There is a plethora of unit testing tools for Java but far fewer for CPP. Exploring the C++ Unit Testing Framework Jungle provides a somewhat dated (2005) overview of the available tools.
Does unit testing pay off?
Does it really pay off to do Unit Testing? According to a study conducted at Microsoft it does. The study quotes an increase in development time of about 30% in order to get decent code coverage. The benefits are a reduction of bugs found in verification of 20% and a…
SBSE meets FST
Together with Wasif Afzal, Richard Torkar and Robert Feldt I have submitted a paper for publication at the SSBSE 2010 conference. The title of the paper is “Search-based prediction of fault-slip-through in large software projects”.
Auto fix your bugs with UT and SBSE
Your mother probably taught you toÂ write unit test cases for all your code? She probably insisted that you shouldÂ write a new test case for every reported bug? You probably wondered why, but still followed her advice like any dutiful child?
Now, the answer is here. With the help of Search Based Software Engineering (SBSE) and Genetic Programming (GP) some researchers have shown how you can use all your hard earned test cases toÂ auto-fix your bugs.